1Cadre de l'atelier
| Objective | Identify critical ecosystem stakeholders and build high-level risk scenarios. |
|---|---|
| Inputs | Missions and business values, feared events and their severity (Workshop 1); selected risk sources and targeted objectives (Workshop 2). |
| Participants | Business teams, functional architects, legal specialists, CISO, and cybersecurity specialist. |
| Sorties | Ecosystem threat map, strategic scenarios, and security measures selected for the ecosystem. |
2The ecosystem
The fourth EBIOS RM fundamental is theecosystem comprising all stakeholders that interact with the subject of the study—suppliers, service providers, and partners. It is an increasingly exploited indirect attack vector: between January 2020 and July 2021, ENISA documented 24 supply-chain attacks, including SolarWinds Orion and Mimecast, with the potential for rapid propagation across an entire sector.
3Assess stakeholder criticality
Each stakeholder is assessed across several dimensions, typically rated from 1 to 4:
Dependence
How dependent is the organisation on this stakeholder for its operations?
Penetration
What level of access does this stakeholder have to the information system?
Cyber maturity
What is its cybersecurity maturity? The lower it is, the easier the stakeholder becomes as an entry point.
A stakeholder that is both highly relied upon and peu mature in cybersecurity terms is the most concerning indirect attack vector.
4Build strategic scenarios
A strategic scenario connects a selected RS/TO pair to a business value, either directly, soit through one or more stakeholders in the ecosystem (an attack path). One strategic scenario may include several alternative attack paths.
5Running example — biotechnology company
Fictional training case: a biotechnology company manufacturing vaccines, with cyber maturity assessed as low.
| Risk source | Concurrent |
|---|---|
| Targeted objective | Steal R&D information |
| Hazardous event | Disclosure of the company's research and study information |
| Severity | 3 — Important |
| Strategic scenario | Comprising three possible attack paths, including one through a poorly secured laboratory-equipment supplier |